<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apache vs. IIS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.devside.net/blog/apache-iis-sys-calls/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.devside.net/blog/apache-iis-sys-calls</link>
	<description>Linux, Windows, MacOS? Who cares. Just give me something that works!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun,  5 Feb 2012 23:12:08 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pierre</title>
		<link>http://www.devside.net/blog/apache-iis-sys-calls/comment-page-1#comment-5596</link>
		<dc:creator>Pierre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 09:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devside.net/blog/apache-iis-sys-calls#comment-5596</guid>
		<description>As G-WAN outperforms Apache and IIS by orders of magnitude in performances (for both static and dynamic contents) and footprint (the 100 KB G-WAN is a *native* Web App. Server offering full ANSI C scripts) it would be interesting to see the same graph applied to G-WAN.

G-WAN is available on Linux and Windows (where it beats IIS-7.0-nested-in-the-Windows-kernel).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As G-WAN outperforms Apache and IIS by orders of magnitude in performances (for both static and dynamic contents) and footprint (the 100 KB G-WAN is a *native* Web App. Server offering full ANSI C scripts) it would be interesting to see the same graph applied to G-WAN.</p>
<p>G-WAN is available on Linux and Windows (where it beats IIS-7.0-nested-in-the-Windows-kernel).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

