It took up an entire cpu on a 4 core processor, ballooned IE load time from 1 second to 15 seconds, caused tabs to crash, and just made the entire system sluggish.

And that was after I turned all the toolbar’s options off.

It’s too high of a price to pay for seeing the PR of websites. Thanks, but no thanks Google. It’s now disabled.

link

1992’s version…

Don’t Copy That Floppy Wikipedia entry.

I doubt it.

Ask yourself this… What is it that has changed since Google entered the Chinese market in 2006?

Google knew what they were getting themselves into: dealing with censored results, government interference, corporate espionage (sanctioned by the state), and much much more. Not to mention having the entire deck stacked from the onset against all foreign companies (in China, you get used, striped, and then disgarded in favor of the home-grown competitor).

So a dozen Gmail accounts get compromised and the finger points to China. A few networks get breached.

So what?

How many Gmail accounts where compromised by government interest in the rest of the world? How many times did a corporate network get compromised by a competitor or a foreign interest? This is standard-operating-procedure in big business and politics.

Let’s try this on for size…

1. Google enters the Chinese market.

2. Chinese market/government favors own state side Baidu.com

3. Google breaks even or loses money on investment. Marketshare does not come.

4. Google realizes how difficult things are in China for “outside” companies.

5. Google, not being able to hack it here, to save face and score some points, uses its PR machine to a) start the process of pulling out of the market, b) make themselves look good doing it, and c) take advantage of a whole lot of people in the process.

And what do you know, it fits!




I’ll concede this could be a bluff to get something they want or there is much more going on that we have not been made aware of.

Zed Shaw – The ACL is Dead from CUSEC on Vimeo.

Here I present you Google Failures of Epic Proportions (a.k.a the other side of the story).

I think the real question here is why has Microsoft been unsuccessful in dominating this area of [internet search] business. Right? After all, this is what everyone agrees on — that Microsoft has failed here.

But have they?…

If you take the time to try Live Search, you’ll know it’s just as good as Google Search.

The problem here is not with better algorithms or a bigger database, but rather with consumer perception.

Consumers *have* made up their minds [<-- one of a thousand examples] that Google is king of internet search. And any decent marketer will tell you that once a consumer has made up his mind, it is impossible to change his notion from that point forward.

*It is that simple.*

Live Search can never compete with Google Search directly.

The above is a failed strategy. It’s just like Google Knol trying to compete with Wikipedia (fail!). It’s just not going to happen unless they are prepared to spend 100s of millions on marketing and the next 10 years slowly leaching away at the user base of whoever is #1.

There are only two ways Microsoft can win market share here: buy another major Search company such as Yahoo (to get their users and brand), or compete with Google search on different attributes.

And this is exactly what they have been trying to do, as everything else is a dead end. And of course with some creative marketing thrown in, they can attack Google on all fronts.

Update: Just take a look a Bing! Fantastic strategy on their part. Rebranding (of Live Search) and marketing at work creating a clean slate in the consumer’s mind.

Bing

Bing is a search engine that finds and organizes the answers you need so you can make faster, more informed decisions.

vs. Google

Enables users to search the Web, Usenet, and images. Features include PageRank, caching and translation of results, and an option to find similar pages.

At first they were kind of cool, but then what do you do with them?

You’re not running a wiki. Right?

Here is how to get rid of them once and for all.

Edit wp-config.php, add this line in to disable the post revisions feature.

1

define('WP_POST_REVISIONS', false);

You will also need to clean the database of all the previous entries under the wp_posts and wp_postmeta tables.

1
2

USE database_name;
DELETE a,b,c FROM wp_posts a LEFT JOIN wp_term_relationships b ON (a.ID = b.object_id) LEFT JOIN wp_postmeta c ON (a.ID = c.post_id) WHERE a.post_type = 'revision';

Congratulations, you are done! Enjoy your now much smaller database.

In my case, the monitor was fine for the first two months. But then started making a buzzing noise… 1) when on, 2) worse when in power stand-by mode, and 3) even worse when turned off.

Thanks Dell!

It seems as if the cheap capacitors manufacturers’ use in these LCDs start to resonate at a high pitch frequency that is very annoying in a quiet room. I’ve read that some people have fixed this by opening up the monitor and putting epoxy around parts … something I was not ready to do.

Adjusting the brightness setting of the LCD managed to fix this problem. Since this changes the power the monitor takes, this also changes the frequency these cheap capacitors resonate at… Sometimes for the better. You’ll have to play around and see what works for you best.

Next time I’m going for a nice non-TN Samsung.