<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Typical Linux FUD Campaign towards Microsoft.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.devside.net/blog/linux-fud-microsoft/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.devside.net/blog/linux-fud-microsoft</link>
	<description>Linux, Windows, MacOS? Who cares. Just give me something that works!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri,  5 Mar 2010 22:57:10 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.devside.net/blog/linux-fud-microsoft/comment-page-2#comment-5510</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 23:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devside.net/blog/linux-fud-microsoft#comment-5510</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;#commentbody-5509&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-5509&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;anon &lt;/a&gt; :&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE cite=#commentbody-1788&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1788&quot; rel=nofollow rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bob Robertson&lt;/A&gt; :&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Every protocol used in F/OSS is fully documented. Every API is available to anyone to implement at will. Every I/O layer, every bit at every level. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;That’s the biggest joke I’ve heard in ages. Majority of F/OSS apps/libs aren’t documented if at all.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That&#039;s a good point.

Also one should consider the poor quality of source-code on most projects, open-source or not.

Personally, I think open-source projects are just as -- and maybe even more -- likely to be poorly coded.

It can be so badly coded sometimes that you need to be a OpenBSD hacker with 10 years experience just to get a clue of what&#039;s happening with a C function...

See &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.peereboom.us/assl/html/openssl.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;OpenSSL is written by monkeys.&lt;/a&gt;

I mean come on, that&#039;s OpenSSL we are talking about!!! Goto statements all over the place jumping from one function body right into another. if(0) blocks to comment out code. And god knows what else.

This is what happens when you take a bunch or random coders, and have them randomly generate code.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="#commentbody-5509"><p>
<strong><a href="#comment-5509" rel="nofollow">anon </a> :</strong><br />
<blockquote cite=#commentbody-1788>
<p><strong><a href="#comment-1788" rel=nofollow rel="nofollow">Bob Robertson</a> :</strong><br />Every protocol used in F/OSS is fully documented. Every API is available to anyone to implement at will. Every I/O layer, every bit at every level. </p>
</blockquote>
<p>That’s the biggest joke I’ve heard in ages. Majority of F/OSS apps/libs aren’t documented if at all.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s a good point.</p>
<p>Also one should consider the poor quality of source-code on most projects, open-source or not.</p>
<p>Personally, I think open-source projects are just as &#8212; and maybe even more &#8212; likely to be poorly coded.</p>
<p>It can be so badly coded sometimes that you need to be a OpenBSD hacker with 10 years experience just to get a clue of what&#8217;s happening with a C function&#8230;</p>
<p>See <a href="http://www.peereboom.us/assl/html/openssl.html" rel="nofollow">OpenSSL is written by monkeys.</a></p>
<p>I mean come on, that&#8217;s OpenSSL we are talking about!!! Goto statements all over the place jumping from one function body right into another. if(0) blocks to comment out code. And god knows what else.</p>
<p>This is what happens when you take a bunch or random coders, and have them randomly generate code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.devside.net/blog/linux-fud-microsoft/comment-page-2#comment-5509</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 22:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devside.net/blog/linux-fud-microsoft#comment-5509</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;#commentbody-1788&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1788&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bob Robertson&lt;/a&gt; :&lt;/strong&gt;
Every protocol used in F/OSS is fully documented. Every API is available to anyone to implement at will. Every I/O layer, every bit at every level.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
That&#039;s the biggest joke I&#039;ve heard in ages. Majority of F/OSS apps/libs aren&#039;t documented if at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="#commentbody-1788"><p>
<strong><a href="#comment-1788" rel="nofollow">Bob Robertson</a> :</strong><br />
Every protocol used in F/OSS is fully documented. Every API is available to anyone to implement at will. Every I/O layer, every bit at every level.
</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s the biggest joke I&#8217;ve heard in ages. Majority of F/OSS apps/libs aren&#8217;t documented if at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.devside.net/blog/linux-fud-microsoft/comment-page-2#comment-5507</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 09:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devside.net/blog/linux-fud-microsoft#comment-5507</guid>
		<description>As usual the Loonix F$F nutwings proclaim the typical:

IWantToBelieve(TM)
FactsAreLies(TM)
LiesAreFacts(TM)
WeAreAnOSNotACult(TM)
BashMakesYouAllSMartAndStuff(TM)
WhoNeedsGuisAnyway?(TM)
We&#039;reJustAroundTheCorner(TM)
WhoNeedsBlueRay(TM)
JustRunItInWine(TM)
CriticalBugReportsinReleasesDontExists(TM)
WhoNeedsLargeFilesInExt4Anyways?(TM)
WhyShouldIProvidefacts?(TM)
MarketshareStatsAreWrong(TM)
DisableCompizIfYouWantSmoothDVDPlayback(TM)
ItsYourFaultXCrashedAndYouDidntSaveYourDocuments(TM)
LinuxIsAllNeedExceptForTheOther80%
UseFirefoxInWineIfYouWantToBrowseFaster(TM)
WhatDNSResolutionSlowdownYouTalkingAboutWillis?(TM)
IntelDriversIssuesAreAllIntel&#039;sFault(TM)
HannaMontanaLinuxPwnsWindows7(TM)
WhoNeedsWordWhenYouGotLatex(TM)
UseEsotericWorkarounds(TM)
BroadcomPartsAreEvil(TM)
MoreDistrosWillImproveMarketShare(TM)
WindowsIsReally&quot;X&quot;ServicePack&quot;X&quot;(TM)

Keep trying linux desktop, keep trying

http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As usual the Loonix F$F nutwings proclaim the typical:</p>
<p>IWantToBelieve(TM)<br />
FactsAreLies(TM)<br />
LiesAreFacts(TM)<br />
WeAreAnOSNotACult(TM)<br />
BashMakesYouAllSMartAndStuff(TM)<br />
WhoNeedsGuisAnyway?(TM)<br />
We&#8217;reJustAroundTheCorner(TM)<br />
WhoNeedsBlueRay(TM)<br />
JustRunItInWine(TM)<br />
CriticalBugReportsinReleasesDontExists(TM)<br />
WhoNeedsLargeFilesInExt4Anyways?(TM)<br />
WhyShouldIProvidefacts?(TM)<br />
MarketshareStatsAreWrong(TM)<br />
DisableCompizIfYouWantSmoothDVDPlayback(TM)<br />
ItsYourFaultXCrashedAndYouDidntSaveYourDocuments(TM)<br />
LinuxIsAllNeedExceptForTheOther80%<br />
UseFirefoxInWineIfYouWantToBrowseFaster(TM)<br />
WhatDNSResolutionSlowdownYouTalkingAboutWillis?(TM)<br />
IntelDriversIssuesAreAllIntel&#8217;sFault(TM)<br />
HannaMontanaLinuxPwnsWindows7(TM)<br />
WhoNeedsWordWhenYouGotLatex(TM)<br />
UseEsotericWorkarounds(TM)<br />
BroadcomPartsAreEvil(TM)<br />
MoreDistrosWillImproveMarketShare(TM)<br />
WindowsIsReally&#8221;X&#8221;ServicePack&#8221;X&#8221;(TM)</p>
<p>Keep trying linux desktop, keep trying</p>
<p><a href="http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rakslice</title>
		<link>http://www.devside.net/blog/linux-fud-microsoft/comment-page-2#comment-5494</link>
		<dc:creator>rakslice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 07:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devside.net/blog/linux-fud-microsoft#comment-5494</guid>
		<description>How&#039;s that for FUD? =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How&#8217;s that for FUD? =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rakslice</title>
		<link>http://www.devside.net/blog/linux-fud-microsoft/comment-page-2#comment-5493</link>
		<dc:creator>rakslice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 07:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devside.net/blog/linux-fud-microsoft#comment-5493</guid>
		<description>People who write blogs on the Internet are not the type to pay for software. They violate the EULA terms of existing copies, or simply result to pirating a fresh virus and backdoor infected copy of the OS from The Pirate Bay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People who write blogs on the Internet are not the type to pay for software. They violate the EULA terms of existing copies, or simply result to pirating a fresh virus and backdoor infected copy of the OS from The Pirate Bay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nagger</title>
		<link>http://www.devside.net/blog/linux-fud-microsoft/comment-page-2#comment-5428</link>
		<dc:creator>Nagger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 00:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devside.net/blog/linux-fud-microsoft#comment-5428</guid>
		<description>I use Windows and Linux (Mint), and I must say that Linux will never win the desktop wars with their current setup.  Users aren&#039;t interested in using this OS, as a whole.  There are too many problems to be had with Linux, and the learning curve is tremendous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Windows and Linux (Mint), and I must say that Linux will never win the desktop wars with their current setup.  Users aren&#8217;t interested in using this OS, as a whole.  There are too many problems to be had with Linux, and the learning curve is tremendous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.devside.net/blog/linux-fud-microsoft/comment-page-2#comment-4475</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 19:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devside.net/blog/linux-fud-microsoft#comment-4475</guid>
		<description>hey guys lets get our panties in a bunch because of an operating system

yay sounds like fun</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey guys lets get our panties in a bunch because of an operating system</p>
<p>yay sounds like fun</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: $mart@$$</title>
		<link>http://www.devside.net/blog/linux-fud-microsoft/comment-page-2#comment-2894</link>
		<dc:creator>$mart@$$</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devside.net/blog/linux-fud-microsoft#comment-2894</guid>
		<description>blogger, you don&#039;t even come anywhere even remotely close to having a clue...  enjoy your utopian fantasy world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>blogger, you don&#8217;t even come anywhere even remotely close to having a clue&#8230;  enjoy your utopian fantasy world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: someone</title>
		<link>http://www.devside.net/blog/linux-fud-microsoft/comment-page-2#comment-2855</link>
		<dc:creator>someone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 17:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devside.net/blog/linux-fud-microsoft#comment-2855</guid>
		<description>Linux users must grow up &amp; realize that Linux is just a piece of software. Its not an angel from heaven sent out to battle some evil or anything like that. No point in being emotional about a piece of software.

Having said that, I must add that Linux offers almost no advantage over Windows or Mac OS X on the desktop. If Linux is stronger on some fronts, it has it&#039;s weakness&#039; in abundance on other fronts. Linux brings almost nothing new to the desktop. This failure is clearly reflected in it&#039;s marketshare. For over 10 years Linux has been made available for free &amp; still has about 3% (or was it 2% ?) marketshare. Linux fans must stop blaming microsoft &amp; focus on their own failings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Linux users must grow up &amp; realize that Linux is just a piece of software. Its not an angel from heaven sent out to battle some evil or anything like that. No point in being emotional about a piece of software.</p>
<p>Having said that, I must add that Linux offers almost no advantage over Windows or Mac OS X on the desktop. If Linux is stronger on some fronts, it has it&#8217;s weakness&#8217; in abundance on other fronts. Linux brings almost nothing new to the desktop. This failure is clearly reflected in it&#8217;s marketshare. For over 10 years Linux has been made available for free &amp; still has about 3% (or was it 2% ?) marketshare. Linux fans must stop blaming microsoft &amp; focus on their own failings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nemes Ioan Sorin</title>
		<link>http://www.devside.net/blog/linux-fud-microsoft/comment-page-2#comment-2273</link>
		<dc:creator>Nemes Ioan Sorin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 11:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devside.net/blog/linux-fud-microsoft#comment-2273</guid>
		<description>&quot;Innovation is a myth. Not that it mattersâ€¦ Linux is not any more original, or innovative, than Windows at the end of the day&quot;.

yep Compare please Aero with Compiz - and U will understand about ...inovation. Using almost any videocard - and from PIII to PIV - Compiz put Aero in the corner. No joke at all.

Also try http://www.glscube.org/ or glscube  videos from http://www.glscube.org/download.html page. 
or 
http://www.mandriva.com/projects/metisse/
or 
https://lg3d-core.dev.java.net/

U will understand what I mean by innovation.

$MS ? $MS it&#039;s about patents. If they think about a new word, they will request a patent to be sure none will use that word. This is the level of $MS.

Where was $MS innovations before Vista for example ? for few Years ? I ask you seriously - tell me some about because I and other web developers ask $MS to integrate some web standards (some CSS rules, PNG alpha tranparency support, tabs, etc) on IE for 5 years - bu we talk, we hear ...until Firefox, then they wake up because IE position was affected - so what&#039;s about customer care ???.

I remember I was using Google Desktop Search and Copernic
because I find XP search utility too slow and too non relevant.
Where was MS innovation there ?? - Well was nowhere because - Innovation is a myth.

Yep, tell that to Industrial Light and Magic, Dreamworks, Disney, Sony, Peugeot, Audi - and they will told you that the computing power and stability worth more than money. They all had money, they choose Linux - it time for you to ask yourself why.

Not because innovation is a myth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Innovation is a myth. Not that it mattersâ€¦ Linux is not any more original, or innovative, than Windows at the end of the day&#8221;.</p>
<p>yep Compare please Aero with Compiz &#8211; and U will understand about &#8230;inovation. Using almost any videocard &#8211; and from PIII to PIV &#8211; Compiz put Aero in the corner. No joke at all.</p>
<p>Also try <a href="http://www.glscube.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.glscube.org/</a> or glscube  videos from <a href="http://www.glscube.org/download.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.glscube.org/download.html</a> page.<br />
or<br />
<a href="http://www.mandriva.com/projects/metisse/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mandriva.com/projects/metisse/</a><br />
or<br />
<a href="https://lg3d-core.dev.java.net/" rel="nofollow">https://lg3d-core.dev.java.net/</a></p>
<p>U will understand what I mean by innovation.</p>
<p>$MS ? $MS it&#8217;s about patents. If they think about a new word, they will request a patent to be sure none will use that word. This is the level of $MS.</p>
<p>Where was $MS innovations before Vista for example ? for few Years ? I ask you seriously &#8211; tell me some about because I and other web developers ask $MS to integrate some web standards (some CSS rules, PNG alpha tranparency support, tabs, etc) on IE for 5 years &#8211; bu we talk, we hear &#8230;until Firefox, then they wake up because IE position was affected &#8211; so what&#8217;s about customer care ???.</p>
<p>I remember I was using Google Desktop Search and Copernic<br />
because I find XP search utility too slow and too non relevant.<br />
Where was MS innovation there ?? &#8211; Well was nowhere because &#8211; Innovation is a myth.</p>
<p>Yep, tell that to Industrial Light and Magic, Dreamworks, Disney, Sony, Peugeot, Audi &#8211; and they will told you that the computing power and stability worth more than money. They all had money, they choose Linux &#8211; it time for you to ask yourself why.</p>
<p>Not because innovation is a myth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
