And the winner is… Helix, for both Windows and Linux.
I was reading my copy of the Unix System Administration Handbook this morning, and came across this passage at the very end…
“We produced the first edition of this book with the UNIX troff package. For the second edition, we used a Macintosh. We produced this third edition entirely on Microsoft Windows 95, 98, and 2000. Oh, such delight! We’ll never touch UNIX again.”
I found the excerpt to be a bit humorous, considering the source [the bible of Unix Administration]. And how Linux is sometimes *pushed* on Windows users, by some. [guilty as charged… but I have changed my ways, I promise.]
Personally, I would rather use the tools that get the most amount of work done for the least amount of effort.
No, it’s not easter, just Valentine’s Day.
Append the URL of any PHP script with a “?=” and the following codes; to drop script output and display…
Zend Engine 2 Logo:
Another PHP Logo:
The PHP Logo is also replaced with an image of a developer’s dog when the date is the 1st of April.
Perhaps in a few years that will be the headline.
In the mean time, lighttpd does look very promising…
“Security, speed, compliance, and flexibility–all of these describe LightTPD which is rapidly redefining efficiency of a webserver; as it is designed and optimized for high performance environments.”
“lighttpd powers several popular Web 2.0 sites like YouTube, wikipedia and meebo. Its high speed io-infrastructure allows them to scale several times better with the same hardware than with alternative webservers.”
The configuration file for lighttpd looks more like source code, rather than a typical ini file. One feature that I am particularly impressed with, that has no Apache counterpart, is the conditional configuration.
Lets hope this project stays afloat. Competition is a good thing, for the end-user.
Also, take a look at the LiteSpeed Web Server.
Why settle on just one Paradigm when you can have the best of both worlds? Use each Model with what it does best…
- One Linux Server for Apache and PHP.
- One Windows Server for IIS and ASP.NET.
- Have one common database backend with SQL Server, MySQL, PostgreSQL, or Oracle.
Place Linux/Apache up front and ProxyPass requests/URLs to IIS, or use some other proxy server to handle the redirects.
In a way, with this method, you can also secure IIS by using mod_security under Apache. Though the days of IIS 5 are over, and I have to admit that IIS 6 and 7 are okay to stand on their own.
Looks promising as Solaris 10 is a great OS with features that you do not see in other Operating Systems. It’s also free.
Getting Real, a book by 37signals.
Over time, with lots of mistakes, I have come to the conclusion that the answer to that question is “no”.
Doing more work will only make things more complicated, and will not increase the user-base. It’s all about ease-of-use, simplicity, and getting the end-users involved in the process [of working on the project] — that makes a project truly successful these days. [a hint of whats to come for devside.net]
80%-90% of the project time is spent working on 10-20% of the features. And it’s just not worth it, it makes the project too complicated, and does not particularly give you any returns.
Do the basics, and forget the rest. You do not need to match a competing project’s feature set. Just make it easy to use for the client, and let your competition self-destruct in complexity…
Here is an example… Take a look at the other dynamic dns providers. Setup an account, and try to figure out what that mess on your screen is. Now look at the DNS menu of dynside.net, pretty simple, right?