<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ubuntu&#8217;s Endgame, Adding Insult to Injury</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.devside.net/blog/ubuntu-endgame/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.devside.net/blog/ubuntu-endgame</link>
	<description>Linux, Windows, MacOS? Who cares. Just give me something that works!</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 07:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.devside.net/blog/ubuntu-endgame#comment-1369</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 17:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devside.net/blog/ubuntu-endgame#comment-1369</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I thought he was referring to your TLD!.&lt;/em&gt;

Your 1st assumption was the correct one. Dylan probably never went to the main site. He was certainly referring to the TLD.

If you like that, see the other thread where people were actually demanding I post credentials of an accredited business and journalism degree before making any further blog posts related to Linux.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>I thought he was referring to your TLD!.</em></p>
<p>Your 1st assumption was the correct one. Dylan probably never went to the main site. He was certainly referring to the TLD.</p>
<p>If you like that, see the other thread where people were actually demanding I post credentials of an accredited business and journalism degree before making any further blog posts related to Linux.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zhx</title>
		<link>http://www.devside.net/blog/ubuntu-endgame#comment-1368</link>
		<dc:creator>zhx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 17:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devside.net/blog/ubuntu-endgame#comment-1368</guid>
		<description>Ah, now that I've been to your main site, I see what Dylan meant. I thought he was referring to your TLD!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, now that I&#8217;ve been to your main site, I see what Dylan meant. I thought he was referring to your TLD!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zhx</title>
		<link>http://www.devside.net/blog/ubuntu-endgame#comment-1367</link>
		<dc:creator>zhx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 17:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devside.net/blog/ubuntu-endgame#comment-1367</guid>
		<description>Closet Microsoft fan or not, I think you make a very good point. Ubuntu is a great OS, but Linux is still not ready for Johnny Compaq or his mom, and I can't think of a single "tech savvy user" or "enthusiast" that buys Dell.

&lt;strong&gt;Dylan says:&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Your blog has .NET in the title, something tells me you are certainly not a Linux fan.&lt;/em&gt;

I hope this guy's joking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Closet Microsoft fan or not, I think you make a very good point. Ubuntu is a great OS, but Linux is still not ready for Johnny Compaq or his mom, and I can&#8217;t think of a single &#8220;tech savvy user&#8221; or &#8220;enthusiast&#8221; that buys Dell.</p>
<p><strong>Dylan says:</strong><br />
<em>Your blog has .NET in the title, something tells me you are certainly not a Linux fan.</em></p>
<p>I hope this guy&#8217;s joking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.devside.net/blog/ubuntu-endgame#comment-1331</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 23:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devside.net/blog/ubuntu-endgame#comment-1331</guid>
		<description>Dell tried to backpedal out of it at first by saying they were only "certifying" some systems as "Linux compatible", but the potential backlash from the community was  deemed too risky. There was just no way to save face but to move ahead. I'm sure they are cursing ideaStorm right now. [My other take is that Microsoft gave the thumbs up to this move]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dell tried to backpedal out of it at first by saying they were only &#8220;certifying&#8221; some systems as &#8220;Linux compatible&#8221;, but the potential backlash from the community was  deemed too risky. There was just no way to save face but to move ahead. I&#8217;m sure they are cursing ideaStorm right now. [My other take is that Microsoft gave the thumbs up to this move]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.devside.net/blog/ubuntu-endgame#comment-1330</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 23:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devside.net/blog/ubuntu-endgame#comment-1330</guid>
		<description>If Dell knew they would not make any "profit" from these sales they should have outright said so instead of sidestepping it and keeping the prices similar to the Windoze machines. It's Dell's fault in my mind that they let this happen, they should have known they could not make a profit because of the crapware ordeal and should have in turn told the community that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Dell knew they would not make any &#8220;profit&#8221; from these sales they should have outright said so instead of sidestepping it and keeping the prices similar to the Windoze machines. It&#8217;s Dell&#8217;s fault in my mind that they let this happen, they should have known they could not make a profit because of the crapware ordeal and should have in turn told the community that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.devside.net/blog/ubuntu-endgame#comment-1328</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 22:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devside.net/blog/ubuntu-endgame#comment-1328</guid>
		<description>I disagree, as the same community that started this by posting to ideaStorm will now be completely unsatisfied until Dell starts to sell Ubuntu/Linux systems at a loss.

Dell is one of Microsoft's biggest volume licensees. My understanding is they only pay $25-$65 per Windows license and move 20+ million systems per year. Add to that the profits made from the included win32 crapware applications [hinted to be $30-$60 per PC], and we are now looking at a loss that can only be partially offset with the drop of basic support...

At this point the "high" price of these systems should not be a surprise to anyone. This is why I have stated that the Dell/Ubuntu deal was set up to fail from the beginning... I'm trying to expose it so the blame can be directed away from Linux -- this is not an attempt to spread FUD...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree, as the same community that started this by posting to ideaStorm will now be completely unsatisfied until Dell starts to sell Ubuntu/Linux systems at a loss.</p>
<p>Dell is one of Microsoft&#8217;s biggest volume licensees. My understanding is they only pay $25-$65 per Windows license and move 20+ million systems per year. Add to that the profits made from the included win32 crapware applications [hinted to be $30-$60 per PC], and we are now looking at a loss that can only be partially offset with the drop of basic support&#8230;</p>
<p>At this point the &#8220;high&#8221; price of these systems should not be a surprise to anyone. This is why I have stated that the Dell/Ubuntu deal was set up to fail from the beginning&#8230; I&#8217;m trying to expose it so the blame can be directed away from Linux &#8212; this is not an attempt to spread FUD&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.devside.net/blog/ubuntu-endgame#comment-1327</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 22:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devside.net/blog/ubuntu-endgame#comment-1327</guid>
		<description>This is Dells fault/problem not the communities. If they want business they have to quit trying to make a higher profit on the Linux machines than the Windows machines. They are hoping to make more of a profit from the free-software movement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is Dells fault/problem not the communities. If they want business they have to quit trying to make a higher profit on the Linux machines than the Windows machines. They are hoping to make more of a profit from the free-software movement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.devside.net/blog/ubuntu-endgame#comment-1304</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 01:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devside.net/blog/ubuntu-endgame#comment-1304</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Buying a system with Ubuntu is not about saving money. It is about buying a system with Ubuntu. &lt;/em&gt;

I'm glad you'll be buying a Dell/Ubuntu system in the near future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Buying a system with Ubuntu is not about saving money. It is about buying a system with Ubuntu. </em></p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad you&#8217;ll be buying a Dell/Ubuntu system in the near future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.devside.net/blog/ubuntu-endgame#comment-1303</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 01:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devside.net/blog/ubuntu-endgame#comment-1303</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I notice that youâ€™ve had a few negative comments...&lt;/em&gt;

You should see the other thread!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>I notice that youâ€™ve had a few negative comments&#8230;</em></p>
<p>You should see the other thread!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ubuntufanboyssuck</title>
		<link>http://www.devside.net/blog/ubuntu-endgame#comment-1302</link>
		<dc:creator>ubuntufanboyssuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 01:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devside.net/blog/ubuntu-endgame#comment-1302</guid>
		<description>It's not Linux fanboys that are the biggest hinderence, it's ubuntu fanboys.  I notice that you've had a few negative comments, most likely from said ubuntu fanboys who, of course, can't stand one negative thing said about their overrated distro.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not Linux fanboys that are the biggest hinderence, it&#8217;s ubuntu fanboys.  I notice that you&#8217;ve had a few negative comments, most likely from said ubuntu fanboys who, of course, can&#8217;t stand one negative thing said about their overrated distro.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
